Parameterizing HTML template tests

What else should we test?

We know that the looks of a page can only be tested, ultimately, by a
human looking at how it is rendered in a browser. However, there is often
logic in templates, and we want to be able to test that logic.

One might be tempted to test the rendered HTML with string equality,
but this technique fails in practice, because templates contain a lot of
details that make string equality assertions impractical. The assertions
become very verbose, and when reading the assertion, it becomes difficult
to understand what it is that we’re trying to prove.

What we need
is a technique to assert that some parts of the rendered HTML
correspond to what we expect, and to ignore all the details we don’t
care about. One way to do this is by running queries with the CSS selector language:
it is a powerful language that allows us to select the
elements that we care about from the whole HTML document. Once we have
selected those elements, we (1) count that the number of element returned
is what we expect, and (2) that they contain the text or other content
that we expect.

The UI that we are supposed to generate looks like this:

There are several details that are rendered dynamically:

1. The number of items and their text content change, obviously
2. The style of the todo-item changes when it’s completed (e.g., the
   second)
3. The “2 items left” text will change with the number of non-completed
   items
4. One of the three buttons “All”, “Active”, “Completed” will be
   highlighted, depending on the current url; for instance if we decide that the
   url that shows only the “Active” items is /active, then when the current url
   is /active, the “Active” button should be surrounded by a thin red
   rectangle
5. The “Clear completed” button should only be visible if any item is
   completed

Each of this concerns can be tested with the help of CSS selectors.

This is a snippet from the TodoMVC template (slightly simplified). I
have not yet added the dynamic bits, so what we see here is static
content, provided as an example:

index.tmpl

  <section class="todoapp">
    <ul class="todo-list">
      <!-- These are here just to show the structure of the list items -->
      <!-- List items should get the class `completed` when marked as completed -->
      <li class="completed">  ②
        <div class="view">
          <input class="toggle" type="checkbox" checked>
          <label>Taste JavaScript</label> ①
          <button class="destroy"></button>
        </div>
      </li>
      <li>
        <div class="view">
          <input class="toggle" type="checkbox">
          <label>Buy a unicorn</label> ①
          <button class="destroy"></button>
        </div>
      </li>
    </ul>
    <footer class="footer">
      <!-- This should be `0 items left` by default -->
      <span class="todo-count"><strong>0</strong> item left</span> ⓷
      <ul class="filters">
        <li>
          <a class="selected" href="#/">All</a> ④
        </li>
        <li>
          <a href="#/active">Active</a>
        </li>
        <li>
          <a href="#/completed">Completed</a>
        </li>
      </ul>
      <!-- Hidden if no completed items are left ↓ -->
      <button class="clear-completed">Clear completed</button> ⑤
    </footer>
  </section>  

source

By looking at the static version of the template, we can deduce which
CSS selectors can be used to identify the relevant elements for the 5 dynamic
features listed above:

We can use these selectors to focus our tests on just the things we want to test.

Testing HTML content

The first test will look for all the items, and prove that the data
set up by the test is rendered correctly.

func Test_todoItemsAreShown(t *testing.T) 
  model := todo.NewList()
  model.Add("Foo")
  model.Add("Bar")

  buf := renderTemplate(model)

  // assert there are two <li> elements inside the <ul class="todo-list"> 
  // assert the first <li> text is "Foo"
  // assert the second <li> text is "Bar"

We need a way to query the HTML document with our CSS selector; a good
library for Go is goquery, that implements an API inspired by jQuery.
In Java, we keep using the same library we used to test for sound HTML, namely
jsoup. Our test becomes:

Go

  func Test_todoItemsAreShown(t *testing.T) 
    model := todo.NewList()
    model.Add("Foo")
    model.Add("Bar")
  
    buf := renderTemplate("index.tmpl", model)
  
    // parse the HTML with goquery
    document, err := goquery.NewDocumentFromReader(bytes.NewReader(buf.Bytes()))
    if err != nil 
      // if parsing fails, we stop the test here with t.FatalF
      t.Fatalf("Error rendering template %s", err)
    
  
    // assert there are two <li> elements inside the <ul class="todo-list">
    selection := document.Find("ul.todo-list li")
    assert.Equal(t, 2, selection.Length())
  
    // assert the first <li> text is "Foo"
    assert.Equal(t, "Foo", text(selection.Nodes[0]))
  
    // assert the second <li> text is "Bar"
    assert.Equal(t, "Bar", text(selection.Nodes[1]))
  
  
  func text(node *html.Node) string 
    // A little mess due to the fact that goquery has
    // a .Text() method on Selection but not on html.Node
    sel := goquery.SelectionNodes: []*html.Nodenode
    return strings.TrimSpace(sel.Text())
  

source

Java

  @Test
  void todoItemsAreShown() throws IOException 
      var model = new TodoList();
      model.add("Foo");
      model.add("Bar");
  
      var html = renderTemplate("/index.tmpl", model);
  
      // parse the HTML with jsoup
      Document document = Jsoup.parse(html, "");
  
      // assert there are two <li> elements inside the <ul class="todo-list">
      var selection = document.select("ul.todo-list li");
      assertThat(selection).hasSize(2);
  
      // assert the first <li> text is "Foo"
      assertThat(selection.get(0).text()).isEqualTo("Foo");
  
      // assert the second <li> text is "Bar"
      assertThat(selection.get(1).text()).isEqualTo("Bar");
  

source

If we still haven’t changed the template to populate the list from the
model, this test will fail, because the static template
todo items have different text:

Go

  --- FAIL: Test_todoItemsAreShown (0.00s)
      index_template_test.go:44: First list item: want Foo, got Taste JavaScript
      index_template_test.go:49: Second list item: want Bar, got Buy a unicorn

Java

  IndexTemplateTest > todoItemsAreShown() FAILED
      org.opentest4j.AssertionFailedError:
      Expecting:
       <"Taste JavaScript">
      to be equal to:
       <"Foo">
      but was not.

We fix it by making the template use the model data:

Go

  <ul class="todo-list">
     range .Items 
      <li>
        <div class="view">
          <input class="toggle" type="checkbox">
          <label> .Title </label>
          <button class="destroy"></button>
        </div>
      </li>
     end 
  </ul>

source

Java – jmustache

  <ul class="todo-list">
     #allItems 
    <li>
      <div class="view">
        <input class="toggle" type="checkbox">
        <label> title </label>
        <button class="destroy"></button>
      </div>
    </li>
     /allItems 
  </ul>

source

Test both content and soundness at the same time

Our test works, but it is a bit verbose, especially the Go version. If we’re going to have more
tests, they will become repetitive and difficult to read, so we make it more concise by extracting a helper function for parsing the html. We also remove the
comments, as the code should be clear enough

Go

  func Test_todoItemsAreShown(t *testing.T) 
    model := todo.NewList()
    model.Add("Foo")
    model.Add("Bar")
  
    buf := renderTemplate("index.tmpl", model)
  
    document := parseHtml(t, buf)
    selection := document.Find("ul.todo-list li")
    assert.Equal(t, 2, selection.Length())
    assert.Equal(t, "Foo", text(selection.Nodes[0]))
    assert.Equal(t, "Bar", text(selection.Nodes[1]))
  
  
  func parseHtml(t *testing.T, buf bytes.Buffer) *goquery.Document 
    document, err := goquery.NewDocumentFromReader(bytes.NewReader(buf.Bytes()))
    if err != nil 
      // if parsing fails, we stop the test here with t.FatalF
      t.Fatalf("Error rendering template %s", err)
    
    return document
  

Java

  @Test
  void todoItemsAreShown() throws IOException 
      var model = new TodoList();
      model.add("Foo");
      model.add("Bar");
  
      var html = renderTemplate("/index.tmpl", model);
  
      var document = parseHtml(html);
      var selection = document.select("ul.todo-list li");
      assertThat(selection).hasSize(2);
      assertThat(selection.get(0).text()).isEqualTo("Foo");
      assertThat(selection.get(1).text()).isEqualTo("Bar");
  
  
  private static Document parseHtml(String html) 
      return Jsoup.parse(html, "");
  

Much better! At least in my opinion. Now that we extracted the parseHtml helper, it’s
a good idea to check for sound HTML in the helper:

Go

  func parseHtml(t *testing.T, buf bytes.Buffer) *goquery.Document 
    assertWellFormedHtml(t, buf)
    document, err := goquery.NewDocumentFromReader(bytes.NewReader(buf.Bytes()))
    if err != nil 
      // if parsing fails, we stop the test here with t.FatalF
      t.Fatalf("Error rendering template %s", err)
    
    return document
  

source

Java

  private static Document parseHtml(String html) 
      var parser = Parser.htmlParser().setTrackErrors(10);
      var document = Jsoup.parse(html, "", parser);
      assertThat(parser.getErrors()).isEmpty();
      return document;
  

source

And with this, we can get rid of the first test that we wrote, as we are now testing for sound HTML all the time.

The second test

Now we are in a good position for testing more rendering logic. The
second dynamic feature in our list is “List items should get the class
completed when marked as completed”. We can write a test for this:

Go

  func Test_completedItemsGetCompletedClass(t *testing.T) 
    model := todo.NewList()
    model.Add("Foo")
    model.AddCompleted("Bar")
  
    buf := renderTemplate("index.tmpl", model)
  
    document := parseHtml(t, buf)
    selection := document.Find("ul.todo-list li.completed")
    assert.Equal(t, 1, selection.Size())
    assert.Equal(t, "Bar", text(selection.Nodes[0]))
  

source

Java

  @Test
  void completedItemsGetCompletedClass() 
      var model = new TodoList();
      model.add("Foo");
      model.addCompleted("Bar");
  
      var html = renderTemplate("/index.tmpl", model);
  
      Document document = Jsoup.parse(html, "");
      var selection = document.select("ul.todo-list li.completed");
      assertThat(selection).hasSize(1);
      assertThat(selection.text()).isEqualTo("Bar");
  

source

And this test can be made green by adding this bit of logic to the
template:

Go

  <ul class="todo-list">
     range .Items 
      <li class=" if .IsCompleted completed end ">
        <div class="view">
          <input class="toggle" type="checkbox">
          <label> .Title </label>
          <button class="destroy"></button>
        </div>
      </li>
     end 
  </ul>

source

Java – jmustache

  <ul class="todo-list">
     #allItems 
    <li class=" #isCompleted completed /isCompleted ">
      <div class="view">
        <input class="toggle" type="checkbox">
        <label> title </label>
        <button class="destroy"></button>
      </div>
    </li>
     /allItems 
  </ul>

source

So little by little, we can test and add the various dynamic features
that our template should have.

Make it easy to add new tests

The first of the 20 tips from the excellent talk by Russ Cox on Go
Testing is “Make it easy to add new test cases“. Indeed, in Go there
is a tendency to make most tests parameterized, for this very reason.
On the other hand, while Java has
good support
for parameterized tests with JUnit 5, they don’t seem to be used as much.

Since our current two tests have the same structure, we
could factor them into a single parameterized test.

A test case for us will consist of:

• A name (so that we can produce clear error messages when the test
  fails)
• A model (in our case a todo.List)
• A CSS selector
• A list of text matches that we expect to find when we run the CSS
  selector on the rendered HTML.

So this is the data structure for our test cases:

Go

  var testCases = []struct 
    name     string
    model    *todo.List
    selector string
    matches  []string
  
    
      name: "all todo items are shown",
      model: todo.NewList().
        Add("Foo").
        Add("Bar"),
      selector: "ul.todo-list li",
      matches:  []string"Foo", "Bar",
    ,
    
      name: "completed items get the 'completed' class",
      model: todo.NewList().
        Add("Foo").
        AddCompleted("Bar"),
      selector: "ul.todo-list li.completed",
      matches:  []string"Bar",
    ,
  

source

Java

  record TestCase(String name,
                  TodoList model,
                  String selector,
                  List<String> matches) 
      @Override
      public String toString() 
          return name;
      
  
  
  public static TestCase[] indexTestCases() 
      return new TestCase[]
              new TestCase(
                      "all todo items are shown",
                      new TodoList()
                              .add("Foo")
                              .add("Bar"),
                      "ul.todo-list li",
                      List.of("Foo", "Bar")),
              new TestCase(
                      "completed items get the 'completed' class",
                      new TodoList()
                              .add("Foo")
                              .addCompleted("Bar"),
                      "ul.todo-list li.completed",
                      List.of("Bar")),
      ;
  

source

And this is our parameterized test:

Go

  func Test_indexTemplate(t *testing.T) 
    for _, test := range testCases 
      t.Run(test.name, func(t *testing.T) 
        buf := renderTemplate("index.tmpl", test.model)
  
        assertWellFormedHtml(t, buf)
        document := parseHtml(t, buf)
        selection := document.Find(test.selector)
        require.Equal(t, len(test.matches), len(selection.Nodes), "unexpected # of matches")
        for i, node := range selection.Nodes 
          assert.Equal(t, test.matches[i], text(node))
        
      )
    
  

source

Java

  @ParameterizedTest
  @MethodSource("indexTestCases")
  void testIndexTemplate(TestCase test) 
      var html = renderTemplate("/index.tmpl", test.model);
  
      var document = parseHtml(html);
      var selection = document.select(test.selector);
      assertThat(selection).hasSize(test.matches.size());
      for (int i = 0; i < test.matches.size(); i++) 
          assertThat(selection.get(i).text()).isEqualTo(test.matches.get(i));
      
  

source

We can now run our parameterized test and see it pass:

Go

  $ go test -v
  === RUN   Test_indexTemplate
  === RUN   Test_indexTemplate/all_todo_items_are_shown
  === RUN   Test_indexTemplate/completed_items_get_the_'completed'_class
  --- PASS: Test_indexTemplate (0.00s)
      --- PASS: Test_indexTemplate/all_todo_items_are_shown (0.00s)
      --- PASS: Test_indexTemplate/completed_items_get_the_'completed'_class (0.00s)
  PASS
  ok    tdd-html-templates  0.608s

Java

  $ ./gradlew test
  
  > Task :test
  
  IndexTemplateTest > testIndexTemplate(TestCase) > [1] all todo items are shown PASSED
  IndexTemplateTest > testIndexTemplate(TestCase) > [2] completed items get the 'completed' class PASSED

Note how, by giving a name to our test cases, we get very readable test output, both on the terminal and in the IDE:

Having rewritten our two old tests in table form, it’s now super easy to add
another. This is the test for the “x items left” text:

Go

  
    name: "items left",
    model: todo.NewList().
      Add("One").
      Add("Two").
      AddCompleted("Three"),
    selector: "span.todo-count",
    matches:  []string"2 items left",
  ,

source

Java

  new TestCase(
      "items left",
      new TodoList()
              .add("One")
              .add("Two")
              .addCompleted("Three"),
      "span.todo-count",
      List.of("2 items left")),

source

And the corresponding change in the html template is:

Go

  <span class="todo-count"><strong>len .ActiveItems</strong> items left</span>

source

Java – jmustache

  <span class="todo-count"><strong>activeItemsCount</strong> items left</span>

source

The above change in the template requires a supporting method in the model:

Go

  type Item struct 
    Title       string
    IsCompleted bool
  
  
  type List struct 
    Items []*Item
  
  
  func (l *List) ActiveItems() []*Item 
    var result []*Item
    for _, item := range l.Items 
      if !item.IsCompleted 
        result = append(result, item)
      
    
    return result
  

source

Java

  public class TodoList 
      private final List<TodoItem> items = new ArrayList<>();
      // ...
      public long activeItemsCount() 
          return items.stream().filter(TodoItem::isActive).count();
      
  

source

We’ve invested a little effort in our testing infrastructure, so that adding new
test cases is easier. In the next section, we’ll see that the requirements
for the next test cases will push us to refine our test infrastructure further.

Making the table more expressive, at the expense of the test code

We will now test the “All”, “Active” and “Completed” navigation links at
the bottom of the UI (see the picture above),
and these depend on which url we are visiting, which is
something that our template has no way to find out.

Currently, all we pass to our template is our model, which is a todo-list.
It’s not correct to add the currently visited url to the model, because that is
user navigation state, not application state.

So we need to pass more information to the template beyond the model. An easy way
is to pass a map, which we construct in our
renderTemplate function:

Go

  func renderTemplate(model *todo.List, path string) bytes.Buffer 
    templ := template.Must(template.ParseFiles("index.tmpl"))
    var buf bytes.Buffer
    data := map[string]any
      "model": model,
      "path":  path,
    
    err := templ.Execute(&buf, data)
    if err != nil 
      panic(err)
    
    return buf
  

Java

  private String renderTemplate(String templateName, TodoList model, String path) 
      var template = Mustache.compiler().compile(
              new InputStreamReader(
                      getClass().getResourceAsStream(templateName)));
      var data = Map.of(
              "model", model,
              "path", path
      );
      return template.execute(data);
  

And correspondingly our test cases table has one more field:

Go

  var testCases = []struct 
    name     string
    model    *todo.List
    path     string
    selector string
    matches  []string
  
    
      name: "all todo items are shown",
      model: todo.NewList().
        Add("Foo").
        Add("Bar"),
      selector: "ul.todo-list li",
      matches:  []string"Foo", "Bar",
    ,
  // ... the other cases
    
      name:     "highlighted navigation link: All",
      path:     "/",
      selector: "ul.filters a.selected",
      matches:  []string"All",
    ,
    
      name:     "highlighted navigation link: Active",
      path:     "/active",
      selector: "ul.filters a.selected",
      matches:  []string"Active",
    ,
    
      name:     "highlighted navigation link: Completed",
      path:     "/completed",
      selector: "ul.filters a.selected",
      matches:  []string"Completed",
    ,
  

Java

  record TestCase(String name,
                  TodoList model,
                  String path,
                  String selector,
                  List<String> matches) 
      @Override
      public String toString() 
          return name;
      
  
  
  public static TestCase[] indexTestCases() 
      return new TestCase[]
              new TestCase(
                      "all todo items are shown",
                      new TodoList()
                              .add("Foo")
                              .add("Bar"),
                      "/",
                      "ul.todo-list li",
                      List.of("Foo", "Bar")),
              // ... the previous cases
              new TestCase(
                      "highlighted navigation link: All",
                      new TodoList(),
                      "/",
                      "ul.filters a.selected",
                      List.of("All")),
              new TestCase(
                      "highlighted navigation link: Active",
                      new TodoList(),
                      "/active",
                      "ul.filters a.selected",
                      List.of("Active")),
              new TestCase(
                      "highlighted navigation link: Completed",
                      new TodoList(),
                      "/completed",
                      "ul.filters a.selected",
                      List.of("Completed")),
      ;
  

We notice that for the three new cases, the model is irrelevant;
while for the previous cases, the path is irrelevant. The Go syntax allows us
to initialize a struct with just the fields we’re interested in, but Java does not have
a similar feature, so we’re pushed to pass extra information, and this makes the test cases
table harder to understand.

A developer might look at the first test case and wonder if the expected behavior depends
on the path being set to “/”, and might be tempted to add more cases with
a different path. In the same way, when reading the
highlighted navigation link test cases, the developer might wonder if the
expected behavior depends on the model being set to an empty todo list. If so, one might
be led to add irrelevant test cases for the highlighted link with non-empty todo-lists.

We want to optimize for the time of the developers, so it’s worthwhile to avoid adding irrelevant
data to our test case. In Java we might pass null for the
irrelevant fields, but there’s a better way: we can use
the builder pattern,
popularized by Joshua Bloch.
We can quickly write one for the Java TestCase record this way:

Java

  record TestCase(String name,
                  TodoList model,
                  String path,
                  String selector,
                  List<String> matches) 
      @Override
      public String toString() 
          return name;
      
  
      public static final class Builder 
          String name;
          TodoList model;
          String path;
          String selector;
          List<String> matches;
  
          public Builder name(String name) 
              this.name = name;
              return this;
          
  
          public Builder model(TodoList model) 
              this.model = model;
              return this;
          
  
          public Builder path(String path) 
              this.path = path;
              return this;
          
  
          public Builder selector(String selector) 
              this.selector = selector;
              return this;
          
  
          public Builder matches(String ... matches) 
              this.matches = Arrays.asList(matches);
              return this;
          
  
          public TestCase build() 
              return new TestCase(name, model, path, selector, matches);
          
      
  

Hand-coding builders is a little tedious, but doable, though there are
automated ways to write them.
Now we can rewrite our Java test cases with the Builder, to
achieve greater clarity:

Java

  public static TestCase[] indexTestCases() 
      return new TestCase[]
              new TestCase.Builder()
                      .name("all todo items are shown")
                      .model(new TodoList()
                              .add("Foo")
                              .add("Bar"))
                      .selector("ul.todo-list li")
                      .matches("Foo", "Bar")
                      .build(),
              // ... other cases
              new TestCase.Builder()
                      .name("highlighted navigation link: Completed")
                      .path("/completed")
                      .selector("ul.filters a.selected")
                      .matches("Completed")
                      .build(),
      ;
  

So, where are we with our tests? At present, they fail for the wrong reason: null-pointer exceptions
due to the missing model and path values.
In order to get our new test cases to fail for the right reason, namely that the template does
not yet have logic to highlight the correct link, we must
provide default values for model and path. In Go, we can do this
in the test method:

Go

  func Test_indexTemplate(t *testing.T) 
    for _, test := range testCases 
      t.Run(test.name, func(t *testing.T) 
        if test.model == nil 
          test.model = todo.NewList()
        
        buf := renderTemplate(test.model, test.path)
        // ... same as before 
      )
    
  

source

In Java, we can provide default values in the builder:

Java

  public static final class Builder 
      String name;
      TodoList model = new TodoList();
      String path = "/";
      String selector;
      List<String> matches;
      // ...
  

source

With these changes, we see that the last two test cases, the ones for the highlighted link Active
and Completed fail, for the expected reason that the highlighted link does not change:

Go

  === RUN   Test_indexTemplate/highlighted_navigation_link:_Active
      index_template_test.go:82: 
            Error Trace:  .../tdd-templates/go/index_template_test.go:82
            Error:        Not equal: 
                          expected: "Active"
                          actual  : "All"
  === RUN   Test_indexTemplate/highlighted_navigation_link:_Completed
      index_template_test.go:82: 
            Error Trace:  .../tdd-templates/go/index_template_test.go:82
            Error:        Not equal: 
                          expected: "Completed"
                          actual  : "All"

Java

  IndexTemplateTest > testIndexTemplate(TestCase) > [5] highlighted navigation link: Active FAILED
      org.opentest4j.AssertionFailedError:
      Expecting:
       <"All">
      to be equal to:
       <"Active">
      but was not.
  
  IndexTemplateTest > testIndexTemplate(TestCase) > [6] highlighted navigation link: Completed FAILED
      org.opentest4j.AssertionFailedError:
      Expecting:
       <"All">
      to be equal to:
       <"Completed">
      but was not.

To make the tests pass, we make these changes to the template:

Go

  <ul class="filters">
    <li>
      <a class=" if eq .path "/" selected end " href="#/">All</a>
    </li>
    <li>
      <a class=" if eq .path "/active" selected end " href="#/active">Active</a>
    </li>
    <li>
      <a class=" if eq .path "/completed" selected end " href="#/completed">Completed</a>
    </li>
  </ul>

source

Java – jmustache

  <ul class="filters">
    <li>
      <a class=" #pathRoot selected /pathRoot " href="#/">All</a>
    </li>
    <li>
      <a class=" #pathActive selected /pathActive " href="#/active">Active</a>
    </li>
    <li>
      <a class=" #pathCompleted selected /pathCompleted " href="#/completed">Completed</a>
    </li>
  </ul>

source

Since the Mustache template language does not allow for equality testing, we must change the
data passed to the template so that we execute the equality tests before rendering the template:

Java

  private String renderTemplate(String templateName, TodoList model, String path) 
      var template = Mustache.compiler().compile(
              new InputStreamReader(
                      getClass().getResourceAsStream(templateName)));
      var data = Map.of(
              "model", model,
              "pathRoot", path.equals("/"),
              "pathActive", path.equals("/active"),
              "pathCompleted", path.equals("/completed")
      );
      return template.execute(data);
  

source

And with these changes, all of our tests now pass.

To recap this section, we made the test code a little bit more complicated, so that the test
cases are clearer: this is a very good tradeoff!

Loading the page in the Playwright browser

We start with a test that will just load the initial HTML. The test
is a little involved, so I show the complete code here, and then I will
comment it bit by bit.

Go

  func Test_toggleTodoItem(t *testing.T) 
    // render the initial HTML
    model := todo.NewList().
      Add("One").
      Add("Two")
    initialHtml := renderTemplate("index.tmpl", model, "/")
  
    // open the browser page with Playwright
    page := openPage()
    defer page.Close()
    logActivity(page)
  
    // stub network calls
    err := page.Route("**", func(route playwright.Route) 
      if route.Request().URL() == " 
        // serve the initial HTML
        stubResponse(route, initialHtml.String(), "text/html")
       else 
        // avoid unexpected requests
        panic("unexpected request: " + route.Request().URL())
      
    )
    if err != nil 
      t.Fatal(err)
    
  
    // load initial HTML in the page
    response, err := page.Goto(")
    if err != nil 
      t.Fatal(err)
    
    if response.Status() != 200 
      t.Fatalf("unexpected status: %d", response.Status())
    
  

source

Java

  public class IndexBehaviourTest {
      static Playwright playwright;
      static Browser browser;
  
      @BeforeAll
      static void launchBrowser() 
          playwright = Playwright.create();
          browser = playwright.chromium().launch();
      
  
      @AfterAll
      static void closeBrowser() 
          playwright.close();
      
  
      @Test
      void toggleTodoItem() 
          // Render the initial html
          TodoList model = new TodoList()
                  .add("One")
                  .add("Two");
          String initialHtml = renderTemplate("/index.tmpl", model, "/");
          
          try (Page page = browser.newPage()) 
              logActivity(page);
  
              // stub network calls
              page.route("**", route -> 
                  if (route.request().url().equals(")) 
                      // serve the initial HTML
                      route.fulfill(new Route.FulfillOptions()
                              .setContentType("text/html")
                              .setBody(initialHtml));
                   else 
                      // we don't want unexpected calls
                      fail(String.format("Unexpected request: %s %s", route.request().method(), route.request().url()));
                  
              );
          
              // load initial html
              page.navigate(");
          
      
  }

source

At the start of the test, we initialize the model with two todo
items “One” and “Two”, then we render the template as before:

Go

  model := todo.NewList().
    Add("One").
    Add("Two")
  initialHtml := renderTemplate("index.tmpl", model, "/")

Java

  TodoList model = new TodoList()
          .add("One")
          .add("Two");
  String initialHtml = renderTemplate("/index.tmpl", model, "/");

Then we open the Playwright “page”, which will start a headless
browser

Go

  page := openPage()
  defer page.Close()
  logActivity(page)

Java

  try (Page page = browser.newPage()) 
      logActivity(page);

The openPage function in Go returns a Playwright
Page object,

Go

  func openPage() playwright.Page 
    pw, err := playwright.Run()
    if err != nil 
      log.Fatalf("could not start playwright: %v", err)
    
    browser, err := pw.Chromium.Launch()
    if err != nil 
      log.Fatalf("could not launch browser: %v", err)
    
    page, err := browser.NewPage()
    if err != nil 
      log.Fatalf("could not create page: %v", err)
    
    return page
  

and the logActivity function provides feedback on what
the page is doing

Go

  func logActivity(page playwright.Page) 
    page.OnRequest(func(request playwright.Request) 
      log.Printf(">> %s %s\n", request.Method(), request.URL())
    )
    page.OnResponse(func(response playwright.Response) 
      log.Printf("<< %d %s\n", response.Status(), response.URL())
    )
    page.OnLoad(func(page playwright.Page) 
      log.Println("Loaded: " + page.URL())
    )
    page.OnConsole(func(message playwright.ConsoleMessage) 
      log.Println("!  " + message.Text())
    )
  

Java

  private void logActivity(Page page) 
      page.onRequest(request -> System.out.printf(">> %s %s%n", request.method(), request.url()));
      page.onResponse(response -> System.out.printf("<< %s %s%n", response.status(), response.url()));
      page.onLoad(page1 -> System.out.println("Loaded: " + page1.url()));
      page.onConsoleMessage(consoleMessage -> System.out.println("!  " + consoleMessage.text()));
  

Then we stub all network activity that the page might try to do

Go

  err := page.Route("**", func(route playwright.Route) 
    if route.Request().URL() == " 
      // serve the initial HTML
      stubResponse(route, initialHtml.String(), "text/html")
     else 
      // avoid unexpected requests
      panic("unexpected request: " + route.Request().URL())
    
  )

Java

  // stub network calls
  page.route("**", route -> 
      if (route.request().url().equals(")) 
          // serve the initial HTML
          route.fulfill(new Route.FulfillOptions()
                  .setContentType("text/html")
                  .setBody(initialHtml));
       else 
          // we don't want unexpected calls
          fail(String.format("Unexpected request: %s %s", route.request().method(), route.request().url()));
      
  );

and we ask the page to load the initial HTML

Go

  response, err := page.Goto(")

Java

  page.navigate(");

With all this machinery in place, we run the test; it succeeds and
it logs the stubbed network activity on standard output:

Go

  === RUN   Test_toggleTodoItem
  >> GET 
  << 200 
  Loaded: 
  --- PASS: Test_toggleTodoItem (0.89s)

Java

  IndexBehaviourTest > toggleTodoItem() STANDARD_OUT
      >> GET 
      << 200 
      Loaded: 
  
  IndexBehaviourTest > toggleTodoItem() PASSED

So with this test we are now able to load arbitrary HTML in a
headless browser. In the next sections we’ll see how to simulate user
interaction with elements of the page, and observe the page’s
behaviour. But first we need to solve a problem with the lack of
identifiers in our domain model.

Identifying todo items

Now we want to click on the “One” checkbox. The problem we have is
that at present, we have no way to identify individual todo items, so
we introduce an Id field in the todo item:

Go – updated model with Id

  type Item struct 
    Id          int
    Title       string
    IsCompleted bool
  
  
  func (l *List) AddWithId(id int, title string) *List 
    item := Item
      Id:    id,
      Title: title,
    
    l.Items = append(l.Items, &item)
    return l
  
  
  // Add creates a new todo.Item with a random Id
  func (l *List) Add(title string) *List 
    item := Item
      Id:    generateRandomId(),
      Title: title,
    
    l.Items = append(l.Items, &item)
    return l
  
  
  func generateRandomId() int 
    return abs(rand.Int())
  

Java – updated model with Id

  public class TodoList 
      private final List<TodoItem> items = new ArrayList<>();
  
      public TodoList add(String title) 
          items.add(new TodoItem(generateRandomId(), title, false));
          return this;
      
  
      public TodoList addCompleted(String title) 
          items.add(new TodoItem(generateRandomId(), title, true));
          return this;
      
  
      public TodoList add(int id, String title) 
          items.add(new TodoItem(id, title, false));
          return this;
      
  
      private static int generateRandomId() 
          return new Random().nextInt(0, Integer.MAX_VALUE);
      
  
  
  public record TodoItem(int id, String title, boolean isCompleted) 
      public boolean isActive() 
          return !isCompleted;
      
  

And we update the model in our test to add explicit Ids

Go – adding Id in the test data

  func Test_toggleTodoItem(t *testing.T) 
    // render the initial HTML
    model := todo.NewList().
      AddWithId(101, "One").
      AddWithId(102, "Two")
    initialHtml := renderTemplate("index.tmpl", model, "/")
    // ... 
  

Java – adding Id in the test data

  @Test
  void toggleTodoItem() 
      // Render the initial html
      TodoList model = new TodoList()
              .add(101, "One")
              .add(102, "Two");
      String initialHtml = renderTemplate("/index.tmpl", model, "/");
  

We are now ready to test user interaction with the page.

Clicking on a todo item

We want to simulate user interaction with the HTML page. It might be
tempting to continue to use CSS selectors to identify the specific
checkbox that we want to click, but there’s a better way: there is a
consensus among front-end developers that the best way to test
interaction with a page is to use it
the same way that users do. For instance, you don’t look for a
button through a CSS locator such as button.buy; instead,
you look for something clickable with the label “Buy”. In practice,
this means identifying parts of the page through their
ARIA roles.

To this end, we add code to our test to look for a checkbox labelled
“One”:

Go

  func Test_toggleTodoItem(t *testing.T) 
    // ...
    // click on the "One" checkbox
    checkbox := page.GetByRole(*playwright.AriaRoleCheckbox, playwright.PageGetByRoleOptionsName: "One")
    if err := checkbox.Click(); err != nil 
      t.Fatal(err)
    
  

Java

  @Test
  void toggleTodoItem() 
          // ...
          // click on the "One" checkbox
          var checkbox = page.getByRole(AriaRole.CHECKBOX, new Page.GetByRoleOptions().setName("One"));
          checkbox.click();
      
  

We run the test, and it fails:

Go

  >> GET 
  << 200 
  Loaded: 
  --- FAIL: Test_toggleTodoItem (32.74s)
      index_behaviour_test.go:50: playwright: timeout: Timeout 30000ms exceeded.

Java

  IndexBehaviourTest > toggleTodoItem() STANDARD_OUT
      >> GET 
      << 200 
      Loaded: 
  
  IndexBehaviourTest > toggleTodoItem() FAILED
      com.microsoft.playwright.TimeoutError: Error 
        message="link the label to the checkbox properly:

generated HTML with bad accessibility


  <li>
    <div class="view">
      <input class="toggle" type="checkbox">
      <label>One</label>
      <button class="destroy"></button>
    </div>
  </li>
We fix it by using the for attribute in the

        template,
index.tmpl – Go

  <li>
    <div class="view">
      <input id="checkbox-.Id" class="toggle" type="checkbox">
      <label for="checkbox-.Id">.Title</label>
      <button class="destroy"></button>
    </div>
  </li>
index.tmpl – Java

  <li>
    <div class="view">
      <input id="checkbox- id " class="toggle" type="checkbox">
      <label for="checkbox- id "> title </label>
      <button class="destroy"></button>
    </div>
  </li>
So that it generates proper, accessible HTML:
generated HTML with better accessibility

  <li>
    <div class="view">
      <input id="checkbox-101" class="toggle" type="checkbox">
      <label for="checkbox-101">One</label>
      <button class="destroy"></button>
    </div>
  </li>
We run again the test, and it passes. 
In this section we saw how testing the HTML in the same was as users

        interact with it led us to use ARIA roles, which led to improving

        accessibility of our generated HTML. In the next section, we will see

        how to test that the click on a todo item triggers a remote call to the

        server, that should result in swapping a part of the current HTML with

        the HTML returned by the XHR call.

Round-trip to the server

Now we will extend our test. We tell the test that if call to
POST /toggle/101 is received, it should return some
stubbed HTML.

Go

   else if route.Request().URL() == " && route.Request().Method() == "POST" 
    // we expect that a POST /toggle/101 request is made when we click on the "One" checkbox
    const stubbedHtml = `
      <section class="todoapp">
        <p>Stubbed html</p>
      </section>`
    stubResponse(route, stubbedHtml, "text/html")

Java

   else if (route.request().url().equals(") && route.request().method().equals("POST")) 
      // we expect that a POST /toggle/101 request is made when we click on the "One" checkbox
      String stubbedHtml = """
          <section class="todoapp">
              <p>Stubbed html</p>
          </section>
          """;
      route.fulfill(new Route.FulfillOptions()
              .setContentType("text/html")
              .setBody(stubbedHtml));

And we stub the loading of the HTMX library, which we load from a
local file:

Go

   else if route.Request().URL() == " 
    // serve the htmx library
    stubResponse(route, readFile("testdata/htmx.min.js"), "application/javascript")

Go

   else if (route.request().url().equals(")) {
      // serve the htmx library
      route.fulfill(new Route.FulfillOptions()
              .setContentType("text/html")
              .setBody(readFile("/htmx.min.js")));

Finally, we add the expectation that, after we click the checkbox,
the section of the HTML that contains most of the application is
reloaded.

Go

  // click on the "One" checkbox
  checkbox := page.GetByRole(*playwright.AriaRoleCheckbox, playwright.PageGetByRoleOptionsName: "One")
  if err := checkbox.Click(); err != nil 
    t.Fatal(err)
  

  // check that the page has been updated
  document := parseHtml(t, content(t, page))
  elements := document.Find("body > section.todoapp > p")
  assert.Equal(t, "Stubbed html", elements.Text(), must(page.Content()))

java

  // click on the "One" checkbox
  var checkbox = page.getByRole(AriaRole.CHECKBOX, new Page.GetByRoleOptions().setName("One"));
  checkbox.click();

  // check that the page has been updated
  var document = parseHtml(page.content());
  var elements = document.select("body > section.todoapp > p");
  assertThat(elements.text())
          .describedAs(page.content())
          .isEqualTo("Stubbed html");

We run the test, and it fails, as expected. In order to understand
why exactly it fails, we add to the error message the whole HTML
document.

Go

  assert.Equal(t, "Stubbed html", elements.Text(), must(page.Content()))

Java

  assertThat(elements.text())
          .describedAs(page.content())
          .isEqualTo("Stubbed html");

The error message is very verbose, but we see that the reason it
fails is that we don’t see the stubbed HTML in the output. This means
that the page did not make the expected XHR call.

Go – Java is similar

  --- FAIL: Test_toggleTodoItem (2.75s)
  === RUN   Test_toggleTodoItem
  >> GET 
  << 200 
  Loaded: 
      index_behaviour_test.go:67:
            Error Trace:  .../index_behaviour_test.go:67
            Error:        Not equal:
                          expected: "Stubbed html"
                          actual  : ""
                          ...
            Test:         Test_toggleTodoItem
            Messages:     <!DOCTYPE html><html lang="en"><head>
                              <meta charset="utf-8">
                              <meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1">
                              <title>Template • TodoMVC</title>
                              <script src="></script>
                            <body>
                              <section class="todoapp">
                          ...
                                    <li class="">
                                      <div class="view">
                                        <input id="checkbox-101" class="toggle" type="checkbox">
                                        <label for="checkbox-101">One</label>
                                        <button class="destroy"></button>
                                      </div>
                                    </li>
                          ...

We can make this test pass by changing the HTML template to use HTMX
to make an XHR call back to the server. First we load the HTMX
library:

index.tmpl

  <title>Template • TodoMVC</title>
  <script src="></script>

Then we add the HTMX attributes to the checkboxes:

index.tmpl

  <input
      data-hx-post="/toggle/.Id"
      data-hx-target="section.todoapp"
      id="checkbox-.Id"
      class="toggle"
      type="checkbox">

The data-hx-post annotation will make HTMX do a POST
call to the specified url. The data-hx-target tells HTMX
to copy the HTML returned by the call, to the element specified by the
section.todoapp CSS locator.

We run again the test, and it still fails!

Go – Java is similar

  --- FAIL: Test_toggleTodoItem (2.40s)
  === RUN   Test_toggleTodoItem
  >> GET 
  << 200 
  >> GET 
  << 200 
  Loaded: 
  >> POST 
  << 200 
      index_behaviour_test.go:67:
            Error Trace:  .../index_behaviour_test.go:67
            Error:        Not equal:
                          expected: "Stubbed html"
                          actual  : ""
                          ...
            Test:         Test_toggleTodoItem
            Messages:     <!DOCTYPE html><html lang="en"><head>
                              <meta charset="utf-8">
                              <meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1">
                              <title>Template • TodoMVC</title>
                              <script src="></script>
                          ...
                            <body>
                              <section class="todoapp"><section class="todoapp">
                                    <p>Stubbed html</p>
                                  </section></section>
                          ...
                          </body></html>

The log lines show that the POST call happened as expected, but
examination of the error message shows that the HTML structure we
expected is not there: we have a section.todoapp nested
inside another. This means that we are not using the HTMX annotations
correctly, and shows why this kind of test can be valuable. We add the
missing annotation

index.tmpl

  <input
      data-hx-post="/toggle/.Id"
      data-hx-target="section.todoapp"
      data-hx-swap="outerHTML"
      id="checkbox-.Id"
      class="toggle"
      type="checkbox">

The default behaviour of HTMX is to replace the inner HTML of the
target element. The data-hx-swap=”outerHTML” annotation
tells HTMX to replace the outer HTML instead.

and we test again, and this time it passes!

Go

  === RUN   Test_toggleTodoItem
  >> GET 
  << 200 
  >> GET 
  << 200 
  Loaded: 
  >> POST 
  << 200 
  --- PASS: Test_toggleTodoItem (1.39s)

Java

  IndexBehaviourTest > toggleTodoItem() STANDARD_OUT
      >> GET 
      << 200 
      >> GET 
      << 200 
      Loaded: 
      >> POST 
      << 200 
  
  IndexBehaviourTest > toggleTodoItem() PASSED

In this section we saw how to write a test for the behaviour of our
HTML that, while using the complicated machinery of a headless browser,
still feels more like a unit test than an integration test. It is in
fact testing just an HTML page with any associated CSS and JavaScript,
in isolation from other parts of the application such as controllers,
services or repositories.

The test costs 2-3 seconds of waiting time for the headless browser to come up, which is usually too much for a unit test; however, like a unit test, it is very stable, as it is not flaky, and its failures are documented with a relatively clear error message.

See the final version of the test in Go and in Java.